The Ooparts Collection

Home

20th Century Dinosaurs

Dinosaurs in Literature, Art & History

Eyewitness Accounts

There Were Giants In The Earth in Those Days

Mega Fauna

Those Sophisticated "Cave Men"

Search for Noah's Ark

DNA, The Ultimate Oopart

The Bone Yards

Underwater Cities, Monuments?

Ancient Atomic Knowledge?

Salvation. What Must You Do To Be Saved?

Search

Links

Guestbook

Noah's Ark: Scale Correlations of Ahmet Object ...Page 14

by Clifford Paiva, Missile Defense Physicist

the ark
The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence. And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth. And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.

Make thee an ark of gopher wood; rooms shalt thou make in the ark, and shalt pitch it within and without with pitch. And this is the fashion which thou shalt make it of: The length of the ark shall be three hundred cubits, the breadth of it fifty cubits, and the height of it thirty cubits. " Genesis 6

ark Ahmet reconstruction and object
This (left) is George Hagopian’s data forwarded to Fred Lee for artistic development of his (Hagoppian’s) eyewitness account. The Ahmet-Simmons’ photo is on the right.(The Ahmet Object photograph is copyright by Robin Simmons/George Adams.)

Ahmet Photo extreme closeup
It is this front correlation view by which the Ahmet Object is most closely scrutinized--also a view which suggests a 6:1 ratio of length-to-width: 300-to-50 cubits (L-W-H); and a firm 1.67:1 ratio for width-to-height: (50-to-30 cubits).

Ahmet Photo extreme closeup
I have used 22 inches/cubit (instead of 18.5 inches) due to the pre-deluvian hyperbaric atmospheric environment and the paleontology record which indicates proportionately large fauna and flora…including man. L-W-H: 550ft. x 91.67ft. x 55ft.; or 2,773,017.5 cubic feet within the object.

Ahmet Photo extreme closeup
The discrepancy is probably due to the Gaussian smoothing function of the pixels within the image taken by Ahmet.

Results: 83% correlation (1.39/1.67) to Biblical Ark using the blur function (Gaussian) in image processing.



My opinion that the Ahmet-Simmons photo is currently the best candidate for the Ark.

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15