by Chris Parker, Copyright January 2009
Photo:Discoverer examines the head of a South American mummy discovered in a cave along with several others of similar height. This mummy is only 7 1/2 feet long (eight feet tall in life?)so he was one of the smaller giants.
We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim). We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and we looked the same to them.”
If there are not hundreds of news stories in the newspapers of the last 300 years about the discovery of sensational ancient remains; giants, petrified humans, petrified human giants and other finds unaccounted for by scienceâthen there are thousands of such stories. Rocks supposedly millions and in some case billions of years old have contained the fossilized or petrified remains of giant humans, mega versions of familiar animals all as reported in the hundreds of newspapers in print throughout the world.
The response of science has been consistent over those 300 years; human beings donât petrify it declares despite report after report documenting there discovery. Despite the testimony of other scientists and despite photographs.
These things canât exist under the current scientific paradigm, soâthey donât exist. In fact, weâve seen that exact argument used by scientists; yes such and such an object looks exactly like a human skull or a giant fossilized human footâbut that is impossible.
Thatâs a little known scientific method.
As to giants, science does recognize Meganthropus and Gigantopithecus as giant versions of ancient manâbut we want to know how science deals with dogs larger than current horses and âmodernâ men the height of a two story home?
This article is a survey of a number of anomalous finds which taken as a whole contradict the “scientific’ story of earth’s history and which taken as a whole overturn the evolutionary/geological time scale. Back in the middle 1850′s a “hoax” was perpetrated on science and the general population known as the Cardiff Giant. Hoax is in quotes because one of the owners of the giant, 10 foot petrified man believed until his death that the giant was real. A Mr. Hull supposedly perpetrated the hoax, but here’s the point; science has tried to use the Cardiff Giant as a means to cast doubt on the hundreds of other similar “discoveries” before and since.
The Cardiff Giant Hoax did not occur in a vacuum. There had been many reports of giant human remains and petrifed human remains in the newspapers of that era; pre Cardiff and post Cardiff. Science has always mananged to throw a little dirt on such discoveries in order to protect the paradigm–witness the Calaveras Skull, often referred to as a hoax because it was “impossible” though in fact it was not.
If the jury is still out on Darwinism, they have taken the following position to shore up their case; if the evidence doesnât fit, it must be counter-feit!
Mystery of the Giant Mummy
Memphis Doctors Say it is Over Nine Feet Long and Weighs 400 Pounds
After a mummy was found not far from Memphis, three medical doctors had a chance to examine it at Jackson Mound Park. âDr. H.L. Williford, formerly president of the Shelby county board of health; Dr. B.F. Turner, professor in the Memphis Medical college and an ethnologist of some note, and Dr. Pate have visited Jackson Mound and examined the mummy. They found the body to weigh about 400 pounds and to be 9 feet Â˝ inches long.”
The body was said to have been in a âsplendidâ state of preservation. No doubt, a 9 foot mummy may have been 10 feet in height in life. The teeth were reported to have been intact, the hair was long and stiff and black in color.
The skin was still pliable according to the doctors and the thumb nails could still be seen. The mummy was bare except for animals skins covering its head and its feet.
The physicians could detect no sign in this case of petrification or ossification and speculated that the body might be that of a North American Indian.
A Race of Giants
The Tioga Eagle
Wednesday Feb 4, 1846
According to the article the Mobile Herald had first reported that the fossil remains of a âhuge bipedâ had been dug up a few days previously in Williamson County, Tenn. It was initially doubted by some that the find was the skeleton of a man but that now that it had received a âfull reportâ of the discovery it was now certain that the skeleton was in fact human.
As the article describes the events, a Mr. Shumale was digging a deep hole on his property in search of water, on a hill located in the mountainous section of the county when the bones were discovered some 60 feet below the surface.
The bones were embedded, it was reported in a strata of hard clay and filled a large crevice in the rock. The position of the bones, said to weigh 1500 lbs was reclining. The bones were reported to be only partially petrified.
According to the Tioga report, there was no doubt in the minds of any of the witnesses that the bones âbelonged to the genus Homoâ. As it is told, all the larger characteristic bones were fully intact; the skull, arms and the bones of the thigh, shoulders, the knee pan and collar bones were clearly and unmistakably human.
It is reported that the whole skeleton was approximately 18 feet high and it was surmised that the gentleman or woman stood 19 feet high. The bones of the thighs it was reported, stood at 6 feet 6 inches.
The skull was sized in the mind of the reader by saying that it was 2/3 the size of a flour barrel and by noting that a coffee cup cut fit comfortably within its eye sockets. The jaw and teeth were reported to be very much intact with various teeth, still attached estimated to weigh from 3.5 to 5 pounds. Wear was evident on the teeth.
It was reported that an âeminent physicianâ was engaged in assembling the full skeleton with small deficiencies to be supplied by art. It was reported that $50,000 had been offered for the skeleton.
Click Here to Read Article Remainder