by David Berlinski
(Video of Berlinski not related to the book but gives an idea of the kind of analysis he applies to the problem)
I read this great book over the weekend. Berlinski is smarter, wittier, more urbane and certainly better informed than Dawkins and Hitchens, two militant Atheists who’ve both made a pile of money recently denigrating God and religion, particularly Christianity. Berlinski takes them and their “scientific Atheists” brothers apart without breaking a sweat and with some humor. We say, if you only read one book this year; read the Bible but if you’ve got more time on your hands, read this book (along with Saboe’s “Days of Peleg”…s8int.com
“David Berlinski received his Ph.D. in philosophy from Princeton University and was later a postdoctoral fellow in mathematics and molecular biology at Columbia University. He has authored works on systems analysis, differential topology, theoretical biology, analytic philosophy, and the philosophy of mathematics, as well as three novels. He has also taught philosophy, mathematics and English at such universities as Stanford, Rutgers, the City University of New York and the Universite de Paris. In addition, he has held research fellowships at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) in Austria and the Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques (IHES) in France.
Recent articles by Dr. Berlinski have been featured in Commentary, Forbes ASAP, and the Boston Review. Two of his articles, “On the Origins of the Mind” (November 2004) and “What Brings a World into Being” (March 2001) have been anthologized in The Best American Science Writing 2005 , edited by Alan Lightman (Harper Perennial), and The Best American Science Writing 2002, edited by Jesse Cohen, respectively.”..Discovery Institute
Reviews of “The Devil’s Delusion”
Ă˘â‚¬Ĺ“Berlinski knows his science and wields his rapier deftly. He makes great sport with his opponents, and his readers will surely enjoy it.Ă˘â‚¬Âť
Ă˘â‚¬â€ťTom Bethell, bestselling author of The Politically Incorrect Guide to Science
Ă˘â‚¬Ĺ“A powerful riposte to atheist mockery and cocksure science, and to the sort of philosophy that surrenders to them. David Berlinski proceeds reasonably and calmly to challenge recent scientific theorizing and to expose the unreason from which it presumes to criticize religion.Ă˘â‚¬Âť
Ă˘â‚¬â€ťHarvey Mansfield, Professor of Government, Harvard University
Ă˘â‚¬Ĺ“BerlinskiĂ˘â‚¬â„˘s book is everything desirable: it is idiomatic, profound, brilliantly polemical, amusing, and of course vastly learned. I congratulate him.Ă˘â‚¬Âť
Ă˘â‚¬â€ťWilliam F. Buckley Jr.
Ă˘â‚¬Ĺ“With high style and light-hearted disdain, David Berlinski deflates the intellectual pretensions of the scientific atheist crowd. Maybe they can recite the Periodic Table by heart, but the secular Berlinski shows that this doesnĂ˘â‚¬â„˘t get them very far in reasoning about much weightier matters.Ă˘â‚¬Âť
Ă˘â‚¬â€ťMichael J. Behe, Professor of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, bestselling author of DarwinĂ˘â‚¬â„˘s Black Box and The Edge of Evolution
Ă˘â‚¬Ĺ“David Berlinski plus any topic equals an extraordinary book.Ă˘â‚¬Âť
Militant atheism is on the rise. Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, and Christopher Hitchens have dominated bestseller lists with books denigrating religious belief as dangerous foolishness. And these authors are merely the leading edge of a far larger movementĂ˘â‚¬â€śone that now includes much of the scientific community.
Ă˘â‚¬Ĺ“The attack on traditional religious thought,Ă˘â‚¬Âť writes David Berlinski in The DevilĂ˘â‚¬â„˘s Delusion, Ă˘â‚¬Ĺ“marks the consolidation in our time of science as the single system of belief in which rational men and women might place their faith, and if not their faith, then certainly their devotion.Ă˘â‚¬Âť
A secular Jew, Berlinski nonetheless delivers a biting defense of religious thought. An acclaimed author who has spent his career writing about mathematics and the sciences, he turns the scientific communityĂ˘â‚¬â„˘s cherished skepticism back on itself, daring to ask and answer some rather embarrassing questions:
Has anyone provided a proof of GodĂ˘â‚¬â„˘s inexistence?
Not even close.
Has quantum cosmology explained the emergence of the universe or why it is here?
Not even close.
Have the sciences explained why our universe seems to be fine-tuned to allow for the existence of life?
Not even close.
Are physicists and biologists willing to believe in anything so long as it is not religious thought?
Has rationalism in moral thought provided us with an understanding of what is good, what is right, and what is moral?
Not close enough.
Has secularism in the terrible twentieth century been a force for good?
Not even close to being close.
Is there a narrow and oppressive orthodoxy of thought and opinion within the sciences?
Does anything in the sciences or in their philosophy justify the claim that religious belief is irrational?
Not even ballpark.
Is scientific atheism a frivolous exercise in intellectual contempt?
Berlinski does not dismiss the achievements of western science. The great physical theories, he observes, are among the treasures of the human race. But they do nothing to answer the questions that religion asks, and they fail to offer a coherent description of the cosmos or the methods by which it might be investigated.
This brilliant, incisive, and funny book explores the limits of science and the pretensions of those who insist it can beĂ˘â‚¬â€śindeed must beĂ˘â‚¬â€śthe ultimate touchstone for understanding our world and ourselves.
Unable to post comment? Email to firstname.lastname@example.org