Posts Tagged ‘giant human footprint’

Another Giant Human Footprint in Stone Found: How Old?

Giants in Those Days, Science, The Flood of Noah, Unexplained Artifact | Posted by Chris Parker
Oct 18 2008 Section on Giants
Link to Video on giant print

(9/5/08) – A retired Cookeville builder has discovered a mysterious set of footprints on his property.

“(My friend said) ‘That looks like a footprint.’ I had seen it before, but I didn’t think anything about it,” said Jackson.

“But then when my friend said that, I got to looking at it, and sure enough, (I thought), ‘It’s got to be a footprint.’”

Jackson pried the fossilized print up from the surrounding rock and brought it home.

As he rinsed off the mud, he was impressed at the detail in the impression. Not only was the outline of the foot clear, but also the impression of the toes, the heal and the ball of the foot. Looking at it from the side, he could see where the weight of the walker had pressed the now hardened mud tightly together directly under the print, whereas the fossilized mud down deeper was not as closely packed.

“This is 11 inches across and 15 inches (long). And my foot’s about four and a half by about 10,” he said.

One of his theories is that the print might have come from a Native American. In the area where he found the print, he has found many artifacts such as arrow heads, ancient tools and even cave paintings.

“But if this was an Indian, he was a very big Indian,” said Jackson.

Another theory is that it is from some kind of animal, though Jackson has no ideas as to what kind of animal it might be. The print itself appears human except for something that looks like a claw mark near the heal. Jackson suggests it might be something like a dewclaw, an undeveloped claw or digit commonly found on mammals such as dogs, cattle and deer.

However, the print is clearly not from any of these animals.

“This kind-of makes me believe in Bigfoot,” said Jackson.

Now that would be a “very big Indian” – the Museum of Hoaxes has taken an interest and calculated that he would have had to be about 8 foot 3 inches!!

He appears to have been lucky enough to find another: In a recent trip back to the site where the print came from, Jackson came across what he believes may be the print of the right foot. This one is fossilized in a much larger rock – one Jackson is unable to pull out. So for now it remains where he found it.

Jackson plans to keep the footprint that he was able to pull up, however he is willing to let scientists study it.

Story Originally Published by Herald Citizen

See Also: Evolution? The Stones Cry Out! Fossil Footprints in Rock Supposedly Millions of Years Old, Parts 1,2 & 3