Whenever one hears about ants or bees or spiders or wasps etc. being found in amber, which are supposedly millions of years old, take note; they are clearly recognizable as; ants, bees, spiders or wasps, no matter how old science claims that they are.
Each of these discoveries are brought to the public in isolation; but the consistent pattern in the discovery of “millions of years old” fossils or of preserved creatures is that they have not changed. Even minute changes that science might point to as showing “evolution” over time can be accounted for by the genetic variation inherent in species.
So the question is; when is this supposed “evolution” occurring?
Recently, scientists discovered octopus fossils which were supposedly 95 million years old from the Cretaceous. If you’re an evolutionist, you were surprised by what was found; they were “virtually identical” to “modern” octopi. If you are a Bible believer, this is exactly what you expected.
Again, taken in isolation, one might explain this lack of change over “millions of years” as an anomaly. But if you were somehow allowed to read about all these discoveries together, the conclusion would be obvious; these creatures are not changing over time–no matter how many mythical millions of years they are given to do so.
Almost like pre-teens, many years ago biologists decided that the coelacanth, a large, lobed fish looked all “prehistoric”. Thinking that the fish had gone extinct with the dinosaurs 65 million years ago, they formulated a theory suggesting that it was involved in the evolution of land animals. However, this fish, which according to evolutionary theories preceded dinosaurs, was found to still be swimming around–unchanged. Coelacanths, as it turns out are “ancestral” to coelacanths, just as dogs and cats are ancestral to dogs and cats.
Have these isolated but multitudinous discoveries made science pause and wonder? No, because we are talking about a faith here.
From the article: “”these things are 95 million years old, yet one of the fossils is almost indistinguishable from living species.” This provides important evolutionary information.”"
We agree….:0) …s8int.com
The Palaeontological Association
Public release date: 17-Mar-2009
Cretaceous octopus with ink and suckers — the world’s least likely fossils?
New finds of 95 million year old fossils reveal much earlier origins of modern octopuses. These are among the rarest and unlikeliest of fossils. The chances of an octopus corpse surviving long enough to be fossilized are so small that prior to this discovery only a single fossil species was known, and from fewer specimens than octopuses have legs.
Everyone knows what an octopus is. Even if you have never encountered one in the flesh, the eight arms, suckers, and sack-like body are almost as familiar a body-plan as the four legs, tail and head of cats and dogs. Unlike our vertebrate cousins, however, octopuses don’t have a well-developed skeleton, and while this famously allows them to squeeze into spaces that a more robust animal could not, it does create problems for scientists interested in evolutionary history.
When did octopuses acquire their characteristic body-plan, for example? Nobody really knows, because fossil octopuses are rarer than, well, pretty much any very rare thing you care to mention.
The body of an octopus is composed almost entirely of muscle and skin, and when an octopus dies, it quickly decays and liquefies into a slimy blob. After just a few days there will be nothing left at all. And that assumes that the fresh carcass is not consumed almost immediately by hungry scavengers.
The result is that preservation of an octopus as a fossil is about as unlikely as finding a fossil sneeze, and none of the 200-300 species of octopus known today has ever been found in fossilized form. Until now, that is.
Palaeontologists have just identified three new species of fossil octopus discovered in Cretaceous rocks in Lebanon. The five specimens, described in the latest issue of the journal Palaeontology, are 95 million years old but, astonishingly, preserve the octopuses’ eight arms with traces of muscles and those characteristic rows of suckers.
Even traces of the ink and internal gills are present in some specimens. ‘These are sensational fossils, extraordinarily well preserved’ says Dirk Fuchs of the Freie University Berlin, lead author of the report. But what surprised the scientists most was how similar the specimens are to modern octopus: ‘these things are 95 million years old, yet one of the fossils is almost indistinguishable from living species.” This provides important evolutionary information.
“The more primitive relatives of octopuses had fleshy fins along their bodies. The new fossils are so well preserved that they show, like living octopus, that they didn’t have these structures.’
This pushes back the origins of modern octopus by tens of millions of years, and while this is scientifically significant, perhaps the most remarkable thing about these fossils is that they exist at all.
To post a comment; send to firstname.lastname@example.org