Painting, left: Grace, by Rhoda Nyberg, 1918. Click for larger version.
Dateline: Brenthurst, South Africa, Sept 5, 2009
âChickens refusing to eat the maize they had been fed has led to the discovery that their feed had been genetically modified to include a well-known weed and insect killer.
Strilli Oppenheimerâs indigenous African chickens were refusing to eat the mealies in the chicken feed bought from a large supplier. Concerned that the birds may be ingesting genetically modified maize, she had the maize tested.
The results confirmed Oppenheimer’s initial suspicion — the maize had been genetically engineered to produce proteins that are toxic to certain insects and weeds.
About her chickens’ refusal to eat their maize, Oppenheimer said: “They’re smartâââŚ…By Dr. Mercola , Mercola.com,
An expert on genetically modified foods said that this was the first instance of which he was aware that chickens had refused to eat such food. The corn contained Bt1, which made it insect resistant as well as Roundup, which made it weed resistant.
Dateline: Cornell University, Nov. 19, 2009
The complex corn genomeâcoming in at a hearty two billion base pairs (compared with the human genome’s 2.9 billion base pairs)âhas been mapped by more than 150 researchers, who worked for years to decipher the grain’s genetic code.
Photo:Varieties of Maize (corn). Click for larger view
âŚ.”Deep into the maize- Getting to the bottom of this staple’s DNA, however, was no small task. The corn genome actually has 12,000 more genes than humans do and manages to stuff them onto 10 chromosomes (as opposed to humans’ 23).
All of this data, and the repetitiveness of corn’s code, made the task a daunting one. The team used a combination of physical and optical mapping to arrive at the findings”…..Katherine Harmon, Scientific American
The article also noted; 1) over 200 genes were involved in simply increasing the size of maize and 2) that the wheat genome is even more complicated than that of maize (corn).
Smart Chickens and Dumb Clucks
Smart chickens and informed humans seem to be in agreement when it comes to genetically modified foodsâthey are potentially dangerous. There is a huge problem with this conclusion, however.
Science tells us that all the major cereals; corn, sorghum, oats, rice and wheat for example, were genetically engineered by prehistoric humans over a few thousand years, thousands of years ago.
They were somehow engineered by these ancient farmers from several inedible grasses into the life sustaining cereal grains that we eat today.
The point is, if what science says about the origins of these important cereal grains is true then the food that provides the basis of most diets around the worldâare genetically modified foods and on an order undreamed about by the current crop of genetic modifiers.
âOn the other hand, those Stone Age farmers who were fresh out of their caves and only just beginning to turn soil for the first time (as the âofficialâ scenario goes), somehow managed to transform the wild grasses, grains, and cereals growing around them into their domesticated âcousins.â Is that possible? Only through a course in miracles.
Actually, it requires countless miracles within two large categories of miracles. The first was that the wild grasses and grains and cereals were useless to humans. The seeds and grains were maddeningly small, like pepper flakes or salt crystals, which put them beyond the grasping and handling capacity of human fingers.
They were also hard, like tiny nutshells, making it impossible to convert them to anything edible. Lastly, their chemistry was suited to nourishing animals, not humans.
So wild varieties were entirely too small, entirely too tough, and nutritionally inappropriate for humans. They needed to be greatly expanded in size, greatly softened in texture, and overhauled at the molecular level, which would be an imposing challenge for modern botanists, much less Neolithic farmers. ââŚLloyd Pye,.. THE LITERAL CREATION OF MANKIND AT THE HANDS OF YOU-KNOW-WHAT”
So, what is it that smart chickens know that science doesnât? If what science says is true, then smart chickens and smart humans complaining about the recent modifications to food crops would be akin to refusing to drive cars that had been mechanically modified by humans. Since cars were invented and modified over time by humans, why should one suddenly get worried and upset by the equivalent of a rear window washer blade?
Is it because smart chickens and aware humans; including scientists and the enviromentally aware seem to know intrinsically that there is something wrong with the official story?
How could âprimitiveâ man set out to create nutritious, edible, efficient food that would continue to be inedible for hundreds or even thousands of years? How and why would they do it?
What did they eat in the mean time? Such a project would have been the biggest and most ambitious project in human history, dwarfing the Manhattan Project to build the atomic bomb, the construction of the pyramids of Egypt and the Apollo program to place a man on the moonâand there would have had to have been separate projects each for wheat, corn, rice and barley!
Note that for corn, according to the latest research, they would have needed to manipulate 200 genes just to increase the size of the maize-never mind softening it and making it digestible for humans.
In an attempt to cement scientific opinion, âscienceâ has been rather insistent that the parent source for maize is teosinte, an inedible grass that does not resemble maize. Not all scientists working in this area agree with that conclusion however and there are competing theories. Some scientists believe that they have evidence of corn appearing before teosinte.
Pennsylvania geneticist Nina V. Federoff states that âto get corn out of teosinte is so â you couldnât get a grant to do that now, because it would sound so crazy. Somebody who did that today would get a Nobel Prize! If their lab didnât get shut down by Greenpeace.â
Indeed, maize is, in origin, genetically modified food, which is at the centre of much controversy today. Still, our ancestors seem to not only have had no such social opposition, but more importantly, were able to pull this stunt offâŚMaize; from the Gods? …… PhilCoppens.com
Photo, right:”Wine, Worship, and Sacrifice: The Golden Graves of Ancient Vani was the inaugural exhibition at the Institute for the Study of the Ancient World at New York University. It features spectacular finds from four graves excavated at Vani, a major administrative and religious center of ancient Colchis (present-day Republic of Georgia) and the setting for the myth of Jason and the Golden Fleece. More than 100 objects from these graves, which date from the fifth and fourth centuries B.C., are on display.” NYU–
âIf you believe that our ancestors domesticated crop plants, you have to start by assuming that people without any agricultural experience were brilliant enough to select and breed the best wild seed candidates to turn into major cereal crops.
It is a historical fact that in spite of 5,000 years of continuous agricultural development we have not genetically bred a new major crop from a wild species. Just how ingenious were out Stone Age predecessors who performed this agronomic feat without any agricultural or genetic knowledge?ââŚ. from: Mysterious Origins of Crop Plants, by Will Hart; Dateline: Genesis: In the Beginning
The Bible Tells Me Sow; Then Reap!
As a result of Adam and Eveâs sin, God told them that they would have to sustain themselves from the sweat of their brows:
To Adam he said, “Because you listened to your wife and ate from the tree about which I commanded you, ‘You must not eat of it,’ “Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat of it all the days of your life.
It will produce thorns and thistles for you, and you will eat the plants of the field. By the sweat of your brow you will eat your food until you return to the ground, since from it you were taken; for dust you are and to dust you will return.” âŚGenesis 3
Genesis 4 tells us that Cain worked the soil. Cain therefore was a farmer and presented âfruits of the soilâ to God. Itâs clear from Genesis that from the very beginning man planted domesticated crops and tilled the soil too obtain them. Wild grain was inedible.
It is clear from Genesis that the creator of domesticated crops was the Creator Himself; the only one with the ability to âmodifyâ food crops which are nearly as genetically complex as human beings.
Hewing to the Biblical narrative; all cultures appeared suddenly, fully developed and without precursors. Along with that, domesticated grains were found associated with all early civilizations.
Man Could Not Have Survived without Maize, Rice, Wheat and Barley from the Beginning
Chart: A-maizing-chart. This chart shows the amazing amount of energy and protein available from the consumption of these cereal crops. Click for higher resolution table.
âCereals are grains produced by plants belonging to the grass family. They account for over fifty per cent of human energy and protein needs, and cereal plants occupy two-thirds of all cultivated land. Cereals were the earliest cultivated plants and for over ten thousand years have been the staple food for many human societies.
Their importance is related to a number of features. They are relatively easy to grow, store and transport and they have a high nutritive value. The table below shows the food values of some important cereals compared with those for some other plant foods. The figures show the amount of energy that can be obtained from and the total amount of protein and lipid present in 100 g.ââŚ..AQA, Longbenton Community College.
The point of the chart is to indicate how well these important food crops were designed. They are highly nutritious and produce tremendous energy by weight compared to other foods. They make up a huge percentage of the human diet.
Can you imagine the human race surviving several thousand years without them? And if it could have done so, what would have been the impetus to âcreateâ these cereals when for generation after generation they would have continued to be inedible?
These grains, supposedly developed by our distant ancestors, are still the primary food sources which support modern day civilization. In poorer areas of the world they are the primary subsistence food-and they have been basically unimproved in over 5,000 years. One would think that if they, the uneducated, uncivilized, primitive, knuckle dragging unsophisticates could create (genetically engineer) rice, wheat corn and barley, that in the last 5,000 years we could have come up with at least one additional domesticated grain?
Smart chickens say no!
Science Too Chicken to Examine Alternatives; Cluck and Peck Those Who Object
When Darwin formulated his evolution theory, he assumed that the single cell was very simpleâsomething that one could imagine could possibly arise by chance. It turned out, that the single cell is more complex than any artifact of man.
When science formulated its theories concerning the origins of the major cereals, it was likewise assumed that the projects to turn an inedible grass into a major food crops were fairly straightforward and conceivable. In June of 2009, in an article by Thomas H. Maugh II, the Los Angeles times reported that sophisticated granaries were found near the Dead Sea which were 11,300 years old as science recons time.
This might have pushed the origin of domesticated crops back 1,300 years more and upset their carefully plotted just-so cereal history-so they claimed that the sophisticated storage facilities were built to store inedible, wild, barley 1,000 years before actual cereal domestication! Science will stretch and pull and ignore facts to fit its theories.
Recent scientific discoveries concerning the dna of plants like corn make the âcreated by ancestorsâ theory even more unpalatableâbut no matter how unlikely science’s version of cereal origin isâthey have no choice but to cling to itâor admit that they were created by God.
The Bible establishes the creation of domesticated plants in the beginning by God. Consequently, from the beginning all cultures would have had access to the various cereals. Science on the other hand says that the various cereal grains were domesticated by man in various parts of the world at various times over the last 5,000 to 10,000 years. In accordance with that, they have timelines and locations for the various grains.
Corn for example is supposed to have been first domesticated in South America and then spread to other parts of the world after being brought back to Europe by Columbus. Other scientists and researchers however have shown that corn existed in ancient Egypt, China, India and even old Europe way before Columbus landed on American shores.
Which is more diificult to believe; the random undirected evolution of living, breathing creatures or the directed creation of the most imortant food crops known to man by “primitive” ancestors over hundreds and thousands of years? Cluck, cluck, cluck….
Draft 2;Citations and links