The Fossil Giants of Castelnau

Posted by Chris Parker
Sep 18 2009

Mr. M. G. de Lapouge had several problems that he needed to try to solve simultaneously back in 1890. Number one, he was a prominent scientist of his time, with a good reputation so why should he be publishing an article in a scientific journal concerning human giants–and of a “type”* evolutionists considered modern?

*Here at s8int.com, we believe that there is only and has only been one “type” of human being. Science has called Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon “prehistoric” and other humans modern.

Secondly, who were these giants who were modern in “type” but enormous when the two groups considered ancestral; Cro-Magnon and Neanderthal were reasonably of the same size of modern humans? Mr. de Lapouge had found evidence in a vast graveyard near Castelnau, France, in the form of fossil bones of a teenager at least seven foot tall and of another enormous man who was close to 12 feet tall.

Writing in La Nature: revue des sciences et de leurs applications aux arts …, Volume 18, in 1890, under the title “The Fossil Giants of Castelnau”, de Lapouge took a calculated risk in presenting his findings to a skeptical scientific audience, which he acknowledges.

De Lapouge noted that no one would contest the fact that giant (mega) animals had existed in the past, quite apart from dinosaurs. Wouldn’t it seem reasonable, he wrote that at the time of the existence of these giant animals that man retained the same ratio of size to those creatures that he exhibits today?

Good question. The answer to his conundrum: “there were giants in the earth in those days..”..(Gen 6) and Cro-Magnon and Neanderthal were not “ancestors”-they lived in contemporary times.

Perhaps there was a time, pre-flood when every creature was large compared to today and that after the flood some of these giants still remained? ….s8int.com

Excerpt from: La Nature: revue des sciences et de leurs applications aux arts …, Volume 18, 1890

“Giants figure so often in our legends and the most ancient histories of the world that it has been a serious question whether a race of gigantic men has not existed at some remote period of time—for example, during the quaternary epochs of the large mammals, the mastodon, mammoth, and so on—and whether the type may not have survived into later times.

Pigmies would have a better chance of continuing to subsist under the supremacy of the normal man. The giants, like the greater quadrupeds, would be exterminated. Our oldest human fossils, however, such as the Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon skulls, do not indicate an extraordinary stature.

Very tall skeletons have, no doubt, been found in some dolmens and barrows, but they are supposed to belong to the Bronze Age race, which is still an element of the European population. M. G. de Lapouge has recently made a discovery which tends to re-open this question.

At the prehistoric cemetery of Castelnau, near Montpellier, which dates from the eras of polished stone and bronze, he found last winter, among many crania, one of enormous size, which could only belong to a man very much over 2 meters (6 ft. 6 in.) in height, and of a morphologic type common in the dolmens of Lozère.

It was the skull of a healthy youth about 18 years of age.

Moreover, in the earth of a tumulus of vast extent, containing cists of the Bronze Age, more or less injured by superposed sepulchers of the early Iron Age, he found some fragments of incontestably human bones of enormous size. For instance, part of a tibia 0.16 meter in circumference, part of a femur 0.13 meter in girth, and the inferior part of a humerus twice the ordinary dimensions.

Everything considered M. de Lapouge estimates that the height of this subject must have been about 3½ meters (11.5 ft.)—that is to say, a veritable giant, according to the popular notion.

He must have lived during the quaternary period or the beginning of the present, but whether he was an instance of hypertrophy or one of an extinct race of giants, it is impossible as yet to say. Singularly enough, tradition fixes the valley of a giant very near the spot in the cavern of Castelnau where the bones have been taken from the tumulus.”

Source:Google Books Online: The Fossil Giants of Castelnau

The Religious Devotion to the Dogma

I love this; an eminent scientist of the time, M. Keiner, a professor of pathology at Montpeiller University, had an opportunity to examine the bones in question. He reluctantly it seems agreed that the bones were human, and that they were “twice the ordinary size”.

However, since he ascribed the size of the bones to an “abnormailty”, he was able to claim that the question as to whether there had indeed been “giants in those days” –to be “unsettled”!

Oh, science, if a twelve foot human skeleton is not evidence that giants existed, what then would be required for proof?…s8int.com

A Race of Giants in Old Gaul

From the London Globe

In the year 1890 some bones of enormous size, double the ordinary in fact, were found in the tumulus of Castelnau, (Herault) and have since been carefully examined by Prof. Keiner, who while admitting that the bones are those of a very tall race, nevertheless finds them abnormal in dimensions and apparently of morbid growth.

They undoubtedly reopen the question of the “giants” of antiquity, but do not furnish sufficient evidence to decide it.

Reprinted in the New York Times, Oct. 3, 1892

Thanks to: James. S.

3 Responses

  1. Administrator says:

    From: Dan Moore

    I see you have a bew system in place for comments. Perhaps I missed the explanation of how one registers for user name and password. Could you enlighten me? Thanks.

    About the giants article from 1890 (how do you dig these things up?):

    I believe there has only been one “kind” of human ever created. Cro-Magnon, Neanderthal, etc. are variations within the norm. The giants are another matter.

    I’m not sure if “Nephilim” is the appropriate term, but there was definitely demonic interference. The enemy can corrupt and distort but not create; that is God’s prerogative. There have been too many giant skeletons found to deny the existence of giants, however hard the anthropologists and archeologists try to bury and ignore them.

    Of course, there is the oft-ignored problem of the square-cube rule, relating to our old friend, gravity. A twelve-foot, proportionally built man would weigh a lot more than 400 lbs.

    Anatomy/physiology and biomechanics would seem to place limits, to our current understanding, on how big humans could be and still be agile and functional.–Dan Moore mentatpoet.blogspot.com

  2. Administrator says:

    Daniel,

    As far as I know, I don’t have a new system for comments. I’ve turned them on in order to post a comment or two and then turned them back off. I’m waiting until I upgrade to the newest version before I turn them back on, Several months ago the comments crashed my system.

    I’ll go back and read the post but of course in my mind there is only one kind of human. The author I was quoting believed that there was more than one type–but I do not.

    Actually, that article was forwarded to me. I have many, many more from antique science mags, but frankly many of the claims would not be believed–even the ones written by scientists.

    As to the weight and height limits on ancient humans; I assume attenuated gravity in the past which also explains how elephants and large dinosaurs could gallop–as seen through fossiled prints

  3. [...] by Dr. Thomas Molyneux M.D., Philosophical Transactions 1700-Taking the Logic out of Mythological The Fossil Giants of Castelnau If There was a Global Flood, Where did All the Water Come From? Relax, You’re Soaking in it! [...]

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Trackback URL for this entry