Peru’s Lost City Is a Natural Formation, Experts Rule

Posted by Chris Parker
Jan 06 2009

Stone formations in the Peruvian Andes that were recently claimed to be the possible ruins of the ancient city of Paititi are now thought to be naturally occurring phenomena, officials say.

Photographs courtesy Peru Instituto Nacional de Cultura

PRIOR STORY
Ancient “Lost City” Discovered in Peru, Official Claims…Kelly Hearn
for National Geographic News

January 16, 2008

Ruins recently discovered in southern Peru could be the ancient “lost city” of Paititi, according to claims that are drawing serious but cautious response from experts.

The presumptive lost city, described in written records as a stone settlement adorned with gold statues, has long been a grail for explorers—as well as a lure for local tourism businesses.

A commonly cited legend claims that Paititi was built by the Inca hero Inkarri, who founded the city of Cusco before retreating into the jungle after Spanish conquerors arrived.

On January 10 Peru’s state news agency reported that “an archaeological fortress” had been discovered in the district of Kimbiri and that the district’s mayor suggested it was the lost city.

Mayor Guillermo Torres described the ruins as a 430,000-square-foot (40,000-square-meter) fortification near an area known as Lobo Tahuantinsuyo.

Few other details about the site were offered, but initial reports described elaborately carved stone structures forming the base of a set of walls.

The state media report quotes Torres as saying the area will be “immediately declared” a cultural tourism site.

Officials from the Peruvian government’s Cusco-based National Institute of Culture (INC) met with Torres on Tuesday, according to Francisco Solís, an INC official.

“It is far too early to make any definitive judgments,” Solís told National Geographic News. “We are going to dispatch a team to investigate.”

Officials expect more details to emerge in the near future

4 Responses

  1. Shiv says:

    What kind of retards would believe that the above photos show a natural formation? I mean come on!

  2. Sim says:

    …The kind that are desperately clinging to a false view of history.

  3. Deniol says:

    I agree entirely. In my humble opinion, the current scientific “leaders” will make such ridiculous claims of “natural formations” just to maintain the errant status quo.

  4. Yosemite1967 says:

    Perhaps one (or some) of these self-anointed experts found something up there that they don’t want the rest of the world to know about. Perhaps the Smithsonian Institute is there now, working feverishly to “disappear” something, like they have at so many other sites throughout their glorious history.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Trackback URL for this entry