Man and Dinosaur In Mongolia.
More Proof That Dinosaurs and Men Co-Existed as Per Genesis

Posted by Chris Parker
Apr 11 2008

テつ By Chris Parker,, Copyright April, 2008テつ

Photo: Dr. Andrews of the American Museum of Natural History claimed to have found the Skull of a creature the size of the Woolworth Building. demo

By the time Charles Darwin published his book テ「竄ャナ徹n the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Lifeテ「竄ャツ in 1859, those with an Atheistic or naturalistic view of the universe already had read and discussed plenty of scientific thought trending along those lines which had provided them with a degree of テ「竄ャナ妬ntellectual fulfillmentテ「竄ャツ. Darwinテ「竄ャ邃「s own grandfather, Erasmus Darwin had proposed around 1796 ideas hypothesizing テ窶 common descent with organisms テ「竄ャナ殿cquiring new partsテ「竄ャツ in response to stimuli., and then passing these changes down to their offspring.

In other words, Darwinテ「竄ャ邃「s book wasnテ「竄ャ邃「t written in a vacuum. In 1809, sixty years prior to the publishing of Darwinテ窶堙「竄ャ邃「s work, Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, had proposed a theory which postulated that organisms were changed by their environments and that those changes were then passed on to their progeny. This came to be known as Lamarckian evolution.

The point is, the scientific world was fully ready for Darwinテ「竄ャ邃「s book and were early adapters of it. Though the theory was broadly accepted by テ「竄ャナ都cienceテ「竄ャツ and certain of the intelligencia, it remained just as is the case today, that most of the public resisted it and continued to believe in creationism.

Itテ「竄ャ邃「s interesting to read news articles of the early 1900テ「竄ャ邃「s and to see how thoroughly Darwinism had already been accepted, so relatively soon after the publication of the book. One can clearly see the ridicule heaped on believers as is done today but, it was still a more innocent time and news articles or opinions that would be edited out or not reported because of the Darwin police still managed to sometimes get through.

This is one of the reasons that this author has searched the archives of that time. If ever there was a time when one might have an opportunity to see reported stories and ideas in the popular press that would challenge or contradict the theory of evolution, one imagines anyway that this would have been the time; when the Darwinian paradigm was not as thorough an editor and shaper of the world one got to see as it is today.

In a 1984 debate with Dr. Duane Gish, a creationist, a Dr. Mayer, an evolutionist, stated,

テ「竄ャナ鼎reationists have stated that humans and dinosaurs were contemporaries in timeテ「竄ャツヲWere this momentous statement true the names of its discoverers would thunder down the corridors of time as individuals who made one of the most outstanding discoveries of the twentieth centuryテ「竄ャツ.

Dr. Mayer wasnテ「竄ャ邃「t the first evolutionist to throw down that particular gauntlet. In fact, this テ「竄ャナ杜omentous statementテ「竄ャツ, that man and dinosaur co-existed, has been proven true any number of times, including here on, if we can reach around far enough to pat ourselves on the back. The problem is evolutionists deem evidence of this テ「竄ャナ杜omentous statementテ「竄ャツ as false on a de facto basis.

As a matter of fact, the continued discovery of living coelacanths, a rather unattractive fish that evolutionists thought looked prehistoric, and thought by evolutionists to have become extinct even Before the time of the dinosaurs, should have already taught evolutionists like Mayer some caution in this area but such proved not to be the case. Evolutionists still hold that man and dinosaur missed each other by 40 plus million years.

In this article, we will prove once again that man and dinosaur coexisted in Mongolia as discovered by leading scientists of the time and as reported in the New York Times and the Associated Press, and we will see if our names or anyone elseテ「竄ャ邃「s will テ「竄ャナ鍍hunder down the corridors of timeテ「竄ャツ, as Dr. Mayer, famous perhaps for his all meat hotdog if not for his debating skills, predicted.

Click Here to Read the Entire Article



4 Responses

  1. David says:

    Do you have a link to your sources?

  2. Administrator says:

    Sources are listed but are not on line

  3. Ronnie Loy says:

    Where are all these artifacts today?

  4. Administrator says:

    probably in museum basements and storage rooms

You must be logged in to post a comment.