Three Out of Four Evolutionary Scientists Disagree

Posted by Chris Parker
Nov 05 2007


“I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks.

Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had.

Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world.

In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.”Michael Crichton

Aliens Cause Global Warming, A Caltech Lecture by Dr. Crichton, Click Here (Retread)

One Response

  1. Robyn Annan says:

    Unfortunately, today, mainstream science is consensus. Education is monitored and controlled by bureaucrats. Bureaucrats control the money. Science needs money, lots and lots of it. Control the money and you control the science.

You must be logged in to post a comment.