Archive for March 29th, 2007

Leakey Makes Monkey Out of Evolutionists by Making “Ancestor” Out of Monkey

Church of Darwin, Science, Uncategorized | Posted by Chris Parker
Mar 29 2007

テつIn His Book “Buried Alive” Jack Cuozzo, an Orthodonist charged that many of the so-called ancestors of man had been altered in their reconstructions in order to fit Darwinist dogma. For example, after examining actual fossils of Neanderthal, he asserted that they had been deliberately reconstructed to look “primitive”. Looks like Cuozzo was right!

Cuozzo wasn’t published in scientific journals but this guy, a dentist,テつhas been. My guess is that he’s a good evolutionist to whom it never occurred that there might be “monkey business” going on with respect to our “evolutionary ancestors”.

Photo: Dr. Richard Leakey’s reconstruction shows an erroneous vertical facial profile on a 1.9 million-year-old early human skull. Bottom: Dr. Timothy Bromage’s computer-simulated reconstruction shows the same skull with a distinctly protruding jaw. Dr. Bromage used the green and red lines to compare the location of the eyes, ears, and mouth, which must be in precise relationship to one another in all mammals. (Credit: Image courtesy of New York University

Man’s Earliest Direct Ancestors Looked More Apelike Than Previously Believed

Source: New York University/Science Daily

Modern man’s earliest known close ancestor was significantly more apelike than previously believed, a New York University College of Dentistry professor has found.

A computer-generated reconstruction by Dr. Timothy Bromage, a paleoanthropologist and Adjunct Professor of Biomaterials and of Basic Science and Craniofacial Biology, shows a 1.9 million-year-old skull belonging to Homo rudolfensis, the earliest member of the human genus, with a surprisingly small brain and distinctly protruding jaw, features commonly associated with more apelike members of the hominid family living as much as three million years ago.

Dr. Bromage’s findings call into question the extent to which H. rudolfensis differed from earlier, more apelike hominid species. Specifically, he is the first scientist to produce a reconstruction of the skull that questions renowned paleontologist and archeologist Richard Leakey’s depiction of modern man’s earliest direct ancestor as having a vertical facial profile and a relatively large brain — an interpretation widely accepted until now.

Dr. Bromage’s reconstruction also suggests that humans developed a significantly larger brain and more vertical face with a less pronounced jaw and smaller teeth at least 300,000 years later than commonly believed, perhaps as recently as 1.6 million to one million years ago, when two later species, H. ergaster and H. erectus, lived. Dr. Bromage presented his findings today at the annual scientific session of the International Association for Dental Research in

The fragmented skull Dr. Bromage reconstructed was originally discovered in Kenya in 1972 by Dr. Leakey, who reassembled it by hand and dated it at nearly three million years of age, an estimate revised to 1.9 million years by scientists who later discovered problems with the dating.

“Dr. Leakey produced an intrinsically biased reconstruction based on erroneous preconceived expectations of early human appearance that violated principles of craniofacial development,” said Dr. Bromage, whose reconstruction, by contrast, shows a sharply protruding jaw and, together with colleague Francis Thackeray, Transvaal Museum, South Africa, a brain less than half the size of a modern human’s.

These characteristics make the 1.9 million-year-old early human skull more like those of two archaic, apelike hominids, Australopithecus and early Paranthropus, living at least three million and 2.5 million years ago, respectively.

Dr. Bromage developed his reconstruction according to biological principles holding that the eyes, ears, and mouth must be in precise relationship to one another in all mammals.

“Because he did not employ biological principles, Dr. Leakey produced a reconstruction that could not have existed in real life,” Dr. Bromage concluded.

テつ

テつ